the internet of things, continued

car-traffic_z1HStUFd (1)Last week, two white hat, or ethical, hackers, Charlie Miller and Chris Valasek, took control of a Jeep Cherokee being driven by Andy Greenberg, a Wired magazine staffer, from Miller’s home ten miles away.  These are the same two who demonstrated their ability to hack into a vehicle’s OnStar system to override the driver’s actions in order to brake the car. On that occasion, the two were in the back seat of the vehicle. But last week’s report that they were ten miles away illustrates the potential on a much more frightening level.

Fortunately for all, the two were working with Chrysler so that the automaker could develop a fix that can be downloaded onto a USB drive (or can be obtained from Chrysler directly, also on a USB drive). Hopefully the two, or other white hat hackers, will continue to search for opportunities so the defects/bugs/whatever we should call them are shut down sooner than they can be exploited by anyone with less than benevolent intention.

Unfortunately for all, most companies consider hackers of any sort a nuisance, not allies. It took 15-20 years for tech companies such as Microsoft to stop threatening hackers with lawsuits and to start inviting them to attend security conferences and even pay them bounties for identifying security vulnerabilities. As Greenberg said in his Wired article, we can’t afford to have auto manufacturers to take that long.

Enter the government : two senators, Ed Markey and Richard Blumenthal, plan to introduce a bill that will require automakers to meet standards to ensure those buying cars in the U.S. are protected against digital attacks as well as protecting privacy. The timing was not related to Miller and Valasek’s latest demonstration. Senator Markey got the message the first time he saw Miller and Valasek demonstrate how a vehicle’s security system can be hacked.

Is legislation needed? Any individual’s answer will likely reflect their position on the political spectrum. From where I sit on that scale, the answer is “yes.”  Laws incentivize behavior with either carrots or sticks. In this case protection of the public is the right behavior. And we can’t wait years for automakers.

We had been considering buying our last car, one with the features to compensate for the effects of aging that we know will end our independence when we can no longer drive.  Not just the essentials – power steering, power brakes, electric windows – but also side view mirrors with sensors to compensate for neck stiffness that makes it difficult to turn to see if there is traffic in the next lane, rear-view cameras to help with parking, and front end cameras to assist with braking as reaction times slow.

For now, we’ll keep our 15-year-old car.

Advertisements

One thought on “the internet of things, continued

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s